Paroxismo Grande ([info]madeofmeat) wrote,
@ 2008-12-24 00:00:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:linkdump

Linkdump: Ming Coat
··· Boingboing sez: Man who set up alternate email for [Bush] White House dies in plane crash. Note the linked article at the end, in the update. He was piloting his own small aircraft, and apparently he's had to cancel planned flights twice in the past because of suspicious problems with his plane.

I'm no nutcase conspiracy theorist, but a whole lot of things that have happened during this administration have seemed mighty convenient. There's 9/11 and many surrounding events (I know, I know, so don't ask unless you're actually interested). There's the fact that oil prices spiked for a while near the end of the administration—an administration full of people with heavy financial interest in and knowledge of the oil market—then shot down super-low in time for the election. And now the man who set up an alternate email system for off-the-record communication—a very experienced pilot—dies in a plane crash. I'll put it this way: I don't have enough information to believe that any of these events were planned or intentional, but I have enough information that I won't discount the possibility.

Oh, hey look, turns out he was set to testify in a case alleging election tampering in 2004 in Ohio. Here's a great blog entry on the thing that actually got a statement from Ohio's Attorney General the plaintiff's lead attorney regarding the vote tampering case. I'm still working on finding a mainstream media source that says something, anything, about the man being set to testify about 2004 Ohio vote rigging, but I can't find one. Awesome job, ABC-CNN-Reuters. Here's another not-mainstream one. Oh, hell, here's the Wikipedia entry on Michael Connell.

Update: No Attorney General was quoted in the Bradblog link. My editor has been sacked. Also, best mainstream article yet, via [info]steamingturd.

Update: Just got this Yootoob link from [info]jakeodd. Very eyebrow-raising. Mine are floating a couple inches above my scalp right now.


··· The Wunder Boner! Via Wil Wheaton, who thinks it's Mike Rowe doing the voiceover and that all parties involved knew exactly what they were doing. I tend to agree. This does not make it less funny.


··· Great pic: Bunny = fail.


··· Yootoob: "Who Says Words with My Mouth." I have to admit that I was paying more attention to the film than the poem. I've seldom seen footage of mixed horse, automobile, foot, and streetcar traffic. Makes it seem more real slowed down like that.

Update: I was just told that this is Market Street in San Francisco. The cablecars should have clued me in, but they don't run down Market Street anymore—haven't for a long time.

Link and update via [info]jakeodd.


··· Cool little alcohol stove from two soda cans. I've heard of this before, but this is the best tutorial I've seen. The wad of fiberglass insulation is a great touch.


··· One Sentence. True stories, told in one sentence. This feels a lot like Postsecret without the visual distraction. And there are a lot more of them.


··· MTBA hackers asked to partner with transit agency to secure system. I remember when this debacle first surfaced. If MTBA fuckers were smart, this would have been a first move rather than a last resort. Lots of money was wasted on this.


··· Awesomest. Beard. Evar.




(Post a new comment)


[info]rightc0ast
2008-12-24 09:21 am UTC (link)
In case no one checks the link ... He didn't just set up an email server for the white house, he still had moved the emails and handled "deletion". Stories have been speculative, mostly because the guy was getting ready to sit down with some press, but hadn't yet, so no one knows now obviously ... but the way these stories read to me, this guy *still had* the missing white house emails.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]madeofmeat
2008-12-24 09:32 am UTC (link)
I'll admit to reading the articles lightly, but I did catch the handling/deletion bits. I like to leave some sauce for the link-followers. Like YOU, buddy.

As for the still-having part, yeah, but the scarier thing is if he didn't, and got offed because Cheney thought he did. Yeeps.

But no, I think he just got offed for the imminent vote-rigging testimony.

O_O

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]madeofmeat
2008-12-24 09:34 am UTC (link)
In other news, I was pretty certain you'd comment here. Hi, howya doin'.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rightc0ast
2008-12-24 10:01 am UTC (link)
Another day another dollar, and rent ain't fallin', heh.

I don't have a DVR and have a real bad habit of staying up to watch Seven Days when it's on Spike and I don't have anything to do in the morning. The great ones always die so young.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]steamingturd
2008-12-24 11:24 am UTC (link)
Slashdot actually linked to an Connell article at KDKA (Pittsburgh TV station) that they indicated seemed fairly neutral, and it does at least mention the testimony thing. Of course, Slashdot also mentions that virtually all of the significant coverage was conspiracy theories all over the left-wing blogs, and that it was hard to find a neutral article at all throughout the media.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]steamingturd
2008-12-24 11:39 am UTC (link)
By the way, I was having trouble finding AG quotes in the Brad Blog article. Mainly, they quoted the attorney representing the plaintiffs in the case at hand, which, while worth reporting, can't exactly be taken as nonbiased.

On a side note, the left-wing blogs harping on about this is a little like shooting a corpse and saying you won a gunfight. I mean, Bush is packing his bags, and Obama's going to be President in under a month, but somehow discrediting the 2004 election is supposed to vindicate the far left in view of not getting their way in the 2000 election. Seems to me it's time to look forward rather than backward.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]madeofmeat
2008-12-24 07:51 pm UTC (link)
There was no AG quote, just my faulty brain. I've corrected the post. Thanks.

Regarding the blogs, there's no way I can't agree with their sentiment. Vote-tampering is serious, high-grade, top-fuel crime, especially if it threw a national election. There's an element of political hissy fit, sure, and I am not only marching in that parade but carrying a banner. Did I have to put up with incompetent leadership for four extra years because they faked votes?! HULK SMASH!

Looking forward and putting the past behind us is (a) what I wish would've happened with the Monica Lewinsky situation, and (b) if a crime was committed, it's letting them get away with it. And I recognize the conflict between the a and b concepts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]steamingturd
2008-12-24 11:07 pm UTC (link)
if a crime was committed, it's letting them get away with it

That's the thing - a lot of people treat it as a foregone conclusion that there's no way Bush could have won a second term (let alone the first one), therefore, it must have been rigged. QED. The only question for them is proving it up before the vast right-wing conspiracy destroys all the evidence.

If there really was a vast right-wing conspiracy manipulating the election, then between a Democrat-controlled administration and a Democrat-controlled Congress, you would think that somebody would investigate things. All you have to do at this point is sit back and let events unfold naturally, and everyone from GWB to Ken Blackwell's secretary will be behind bars within the next four years.

I would bet dollars to donuts, though, that no such investigation will take place, largely because the purported conspiracy to rig the Ohio election in 2004 is a fabrication made from unfortunate remarks and helpful coincidences.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]madeofmeat
2008-12-24 11:39 pm UTC (link)
The QED part is a problem for me, too. It's not a foregone conclusion. But the remarks and coincidences, paired with the seriousness of the charge, necessitate serious investigation. If not enough evidence is found to put anyone in jail, well, there's that. I'll still whine about it four years from now, but I'll have stopped calling for further investigation. WRT an investigation not taking place, you're probably right, but I think it will be because of a lack of will in Congress and a lack of ready evidence, neither of which have an overwhelming relationship to whether or not a crime was committed. I'll stress that I don't want people put in jail on shoddy evidence; that's not in my Constitution (both the proper and nonproper noun forms! That was serendipitous phrasing!). But absence of investigation/prosecution is not safe evidence to firmly conclude absence of crime. The sounds nasty, but it's true.

I'll also say that we've profited as a nation from the experience, whether or not any actual vote tampering occurred. The Ohio Secretary of State was under many, many microscopes during this election, and got her shit done very effectively, apparently (I say this not because my candidate won there, but because no one had any significant objections to the process or results). The SoS office there is partisan, which made her job doubly difficult. And still it got pulled off. I don't think we'll have many unanswered questions about vote tampering for the next four or five presidential elections, at least.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]steamingturd
2008-12-25 03:51 pm UTC (link)
There were some questions thrown around about voter registration problems and false registrations on the rolls this time around. I don't remember if it was directly connected to the ACORN pay-you-to-register fiasco or if that was something separate. In any case, it ended up as water under the bridge this time because the election wasn't a close call.

I don't think any election could be considered 100% "fair and square," though. There are too many people either pulling shenanigans or displaying their ineptitude to make any election perfect.

On a side note, the Senate election in Minnesota is turning out to be quite the mess. I know there are at least some accusations that irregularities in the recount process are favoring Franken, although the report I saw had an opinion-esque quality, was authored by a conservative writer, and didn't really make it clear whether the mistakes presented in the report were representative of all the mistakes (implying that they were done that way intentionally) or if the writer was cherry-picking them. Still, if you want to read it, here it is.

Actually, right after I got done writing that, I did a search for the author and found a blog post by the same author clarifying his report here.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]madeofmeat
2008-12-25 10:21 pm UTC (link)
Eh, good point. If Bush had won by a nationwide landslide, I wouldn't be whining about Ohio.

Regarding Minnesota, I heard years ago that all any election official dreams about is a landslide. The job only gets stressful in cases like Minnesota's. They must have had a dozen heart attacks throughout the ranks by now. I think the commentary you cited was probably terribly cherrypicked, but I understood his point. I think it all sucks, too. What happened to the Scantron practices from when we were kids, wherein more than one marked bubble meant the question wasn't counted? I don't think that second-guessing the voter gives the process any more credibility. From the numbers I've heard, Franken would have lost if clear and simple practices had been stuck to, and that's fine.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]madeofmeat
2008-12-25 10:25 pm UTC (link)
Oh, and did you see Jakeodd's comment below? Lots more information that don't prove anything per se, but if it doesn't raise your eyebrows a little, perhaps someone has slipped you Botox in your slumber.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jakeodd
2008-12-25 04:55 am UTC (link)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]madeofmeat
2008-12-25 10:03 pm UTC (link)
That is excellent. Thank you!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…